Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: The type of ssl_renegotiation_limit

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: The type of ssl_renegotiation_limit
Date: 2010-03-17 18:04:12
Message-ID: 9837222c1003171104w1e751c83i3ae3904495c87dc8@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 03:28, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/runtime-config-connection.html#RUNTIME-CONFIG-CONNECTION-SECURITY
>
>> ssl_renegotiation_limit (int)
>
> It's described that the type of ssl_renegotiation_limit is "int".
> Though it's not apparent error, we should use "integer" rather than
> "int". In the description of other parameters, "integer" has been
> used. Here is the patch.

You are right, of course. Applied, thanks!

-- 
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Fujii MasaoDate: 2010-03-18 14:27:59
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make standby server continuously retry restoring the next WAL
Previous:From: Roderick A. AndersonDate: 2010-03-17 15:38:06
Subject: Re: Incorrect SQL on CREATE INDEX page

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group