On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 03:28, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> ssl_renegotiation_limit (int)
> It's described that the type of ssl_renegotiation_limit is "int".
> Though it's not apparent error, we should use "integer" rather than
> "int". In the description of other parameters, "integer" has been
> used. Here is the patch.
You are right, of course. Applied, thanks!
In response to
pgsql-docs by date
|Next:||From: Fujii Masao||Date: 2010-03-18 14:27:59|
|Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make standby server continuously retry restoring the next WAL|
|Previous:||From: Roderick A. Anderson||Date: 2010-03-17 15:38:06|
|Subject: Re: Incorrect SQL on CREATE INDEX page|