On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 21:38, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>> I can certainly review the win32 encoding patch, but I was rather
>> hoping for some comments from others on if we're interested in a win32
>> only solution, or if we want something more generic. Should we just go
>> with the win32-only one for now?
> That was actually the only substantive comment I had about it. I don't
> see why it's a win32-only problem or why a win32-only solution is a good
Yeah, that's my thought as well.
If we want a complete one, we should reject this patch and ask for one
that does that.
If we are fine with a win32 only one, I can review this one and get it in.
I'm leaning towards us wanting a general one, but I'm unsure how much
work that will take.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2009-09-30 19:52:29|
|Subject: Re: latest hstore patch |
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2009-09-30 19:40:21|
|Subject: Re: Unicode UTF-8 table formatting for psql text output |