Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on
Date: 2009-09-30 19:45:29
Message-ID: 9837222c0909301245v7cec1cds9afb403afb5d23d5@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 21:38, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>> I can certainly review the win32 encoding patch, but I was rather
>> hoping for some comments from others on if we're interested in a win32
>> only solution, or if we want something more generic. Should we just go
>> with the win32-only one for now?
>
> That was actually the only substantive comment I had about it.  I don't
> see why it's a win32-only problem or why a win32-only solution is a good
> approach.

Yeah, that's my thought as well.

If we want a complete one, we should reject this patch and ask for one
that does that.

If we are fine with a win32 only one, I can review this one and get it in.

I'm leaning towards us wanting a general one, but I'm unsure how much
work that will take.


-- 
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2009-09-30 19:52:29
Subject: Re: latest hstore patch
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2009-09-30 19:40:21
Subject: Re: Unicode UTF-8 table formatting for psql text output

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group