On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 05:35, Tom Lane<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> There are a few patches that have some level of committer endorsement
>> from previous discussions, and it's not clear whether any round-robin
>> review is required. These are:
>> Fix memory leak in win32 security functions (Magnus)
>> do_tup_output_datum v2 (Tom)
>> These might be worth a quick look by the respective committers to see
>> whether these can just go in. If not, we'll assign round-robin
> Roger, I'll look at do_tup_output_datum in the morning, but I think
> it's noncontroversial.
> Magnus just got back from sailing and presumably will catch up on
> his commitments in due course ...
Yeah, I'm still backlogged but I'm getting there. That specific patch
is something I've already reviewed, so I just need to verify there has
been no drift (not likely) and get it in. I expect to get to
commitfest work within a day or two.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2009-07-22 07:45:01|
|Subject: Re: [PATCH] SE-PgSQL/tiny rev.2193|
|Previous:||From: Brendan Jurd||Date: 2009-07-22 05:53:53|
|Subject: Re: pg_dump Add dumping of comments on index columns|