Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] TODO doc items

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-documentation <docs(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] TODO doc items
Date: 2000-04-13 07:07:00
Message-ID: 9591.955609620@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Here are the open doc items.  Should we consider ecpg.sgml as up-to-date
> as it needs to be for 7.0?

Michael Meskes said he thought the ecpg page was out of date ... but
AFAICS it's his responsibility to update it.  If he doesn't get it
done, is there anyone else qualified to do it?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Jan WieckDate: 2000-04-13 07:33:46
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] TODO doc items
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2000-04-13 05:55:07
Subject: Re: the Chinese version docs

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group