Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Re: time + date_part oddness?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: time + date_part oddness?
Date: 2001-01-05 07:39:12
Message-ID: 9507.978680352@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org> writes:
> In the meantime, I haven't quite figured out how to
> start decoupling my various projects from my long-standing
> lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu address,

I'm not even trying ... I don't work for SSS anymore, but I'll be
tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us for the foreseeable future.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Hiroshi InoueDate: 2001-01-05 07:55:23
Subject: Re: Well, we seem to be proof against cache-inval problems now
Previous:From: Thomas LockhartDate: 2001-01-05 07:31:23
Subject: Re: Re: time + date_part oddness?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group