Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Um, doesn't that require nonrectangular arrays?

> Doh.  You're right: I keep forgetting that arrays have to be rectangular.

> Any suggestions on a sensible way to represent this?

Are there likely to be enough entries that storage efficiency actually
matters?  If not, we could use a 2xN array of {key,allowed_value} pairs,
that is

{{thingy,item1},{thingy,item2},{otherthingy,foo},{otherthingy,bar}}

Or perhaps push these out into a separate table, along the lines
of
	oid	key	allowed_value
and use an oidvector to list the selected values in a trigger entry?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

• Re: Event Triggers reduced, v1 at 2012-07-03 02:53:15 from Robert Haas

Responses

• Re: Event Triggers reduced, v1 at 2012-07-03 12:22:17 from Robert Haas

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2012-07-03 03:28:33
	Subject: Re: Uh, I change my mind about commit_delay + commit_siblings (sort of)
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2012-07-03 03:18:04
	Subject: Re: huge tlb support