Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu> writes:
> On Sat, 24 Dec 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Removing these comments entirely, without changing the code they explain,
>> doesn't strike me as an improvement.
> I just checked if we can remove XLOG_NO_TRAN happily, and the conclusion
> is that it could bring some benefits (though not much) to our system. The
> key is the CheckpointStartLock lock.
Hm. Perhaps we could keep the current behavior and re-document
XLOG_NO_TRAN as meaning that the xlog record does not involve the
insertion of our XID into permanent storage.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2005-12-26 15:11:07|
|Subject: Re: [PATCHES] default resource limits |
|Previous:||From: Akio Iwaasa||Date: 2005-12-26 13:34:52|
|Subject: BUG #2129: dblink problem|