Re: HOT patch - version 14

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: HOT patch - version 14
Date: 2007-08-20 14:46:24
Message-ID: 9444.1187621184@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> I see that you have a separate bitmapset to keep track of indexes on
> system attributes. But having an index on a system attribute doesn't
> make any sense, does it?

Counterexample: OID.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zdenek Kotala 2007-08-20 15:40:51 Re: PAM authentication fails for local UNIX users
Previous Message Andrew Chernow 2007-08-20 14:24:17 Patch to correct 64-bit money type in 8.3devel