Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote: > I feel sorry for 8.5 now. It had such high hopes of becoming a proper > version. Yeah, well - it'll be remembered. I still find occasional references to PostgreSQL 7.5 in the pgAdmin code. > So, does this mean the next alpha/beta will be named 9.0 too? 9.0alpha4 -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
In response to
- Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0 at 2010-01-21 10:54:02 from Thom Brown
Responses
- Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 vs. 9.0 at 2010-01-21 19:00:12 from Guillaume Lelarge
pgsql-hackers by date
Next: From: Greg Stark Date: 2010-01-21 11:06:04 Subject: Re: About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch Previous: From: Thom Brown Date: 2010-01-21 10:54:02 Subject: Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0
pgadmin-hackers by date
Next: From: Greg Sabino Mullane Date: 2010-01-21 12:26:27 Subject: Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0 Previous: From: Thom Brown Date: 2010-01-21 10:54:02 Subject: Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0