Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0
Date: 2010-01-21 10:57:35
Message-ID: 937d27e11001210257nc9403ep4a49ba50d6e7858a@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackerspgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> I feel sorry for 8.5 now.  It had such high hopes of becoming a proper
> version.

Yeah, well - it'll be remembered. I still find occasional references
to PostgreSQL 7.5 in the pgAdmin code.

> So, does this mean the next alpha/beta will be named 9.0 too?

9.0alpha4


-- 
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Greg StarkDate: 2010-01-21 11:06:04
Subject: Re: About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch
Previous:From: Thom BrownDate: 2010-01-21 10:54:02
Subject: Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0

pgadmin-hackers by date

Next:From: Greg Sabino MullaneDate: 2010-01-21 12:26:27
Subject: Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0
Previous:From: Thom BrownDate: 2010-01-21 10:54:02
Subject: Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group