Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Trac tickets

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
Cc: pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Trac tickets
Date: 2009-08-07 08:48:41
Message-ID: 937d27e10908070148r70aec0f0mb38ddcedcf7d29f3@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Guillaume
Lelarge<guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
> Le jeudi 6 août 2009 à 13:10:24, Dave Page a écrit :
>> Why are trac tickets being created for the recent change history?
>> That's what the changelog and svn history is for...
>
> Yes. I created them to try to use the roadmap system. See this:
>
>  http://code.pgadmin.org/trac/roadmap
> and this:
>
>  http://code.pgadmin.org/trac/query?milestone=1.10.1&order=priority&col=id&col=summary&col=status&col=type&col=priority&col=milestone&col=component
> (which is kind of a changelog and a todo list)

OK, well if you want to start maintaining this, please have a think
about how we can modify the existing processes to accomodate it. At
the very least, I would like to avoid the changelog duplication - can
we drop that file, or auto-create it for example?


-- 
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK:   http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

pgadmin-hackers by date

Next:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2009-08-07 11:35:51
Subject: Re: Trac tickets
Previous:From: Guillaume LelargeDate: 2009-08-06 21:13:18
Subject: Re: Patch to fix Debian Bug #451038

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group