On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 8:29 PM, Bruce Momjian<bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Anyway, that "formal support" paragraph needs to be modified. If it
>> relates to formal _installer_ support, it needs clarification. If it is
>> for general support, it should be removed, and I would like to know how
>> it got in there in the first place.
> Ah, I see Dave has changed it today in Git:
Oops - I thought I mailed the list, not you alone.
> I am still curious how it got in there in the first place, i.e. who
> at EDB thought that was acceptable, and if you don't want to give names,
> someone better tell them to avoid such mistakes in the future.
I wrote it, under the assumption that no other companies would want to
support our installers (*not* PG support - that's covered in the next
paragraph). As far as I know, noone else at EDB has bothered to read
it. It was one of those Friday afternoon things that got rattled off
in five minutes when I realised we had nowhere to note licence details
or where to get help etc.
As I said - patches are welcome.
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
In response to
pgsql-advocacy by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2009-07-09 20:03:29|
|Subject: Re: EDB taking over? Another heart attack.|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2009-07-09 19:33:30|
|Subject: Re: Vote on Windows installer links|