On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Sufficool, Stanley
> If we can get these tools as libraries with exported functions, then
> wouldn't just be a matter of some UDF calling the C libraries?
> It would be ideal to get this absorbed into the mainline PG development,
> but proof that it works and has a userbase would go a long way towards
> As I noted in my first post, I am very aware that this could break
> client side backups. Your idea of streaming the backup is something I
> hadn't considered. If the stream was compressed, then this would
> actually reduce backup times at the client!
> Should I join and cross post to pg-hackers to bring them into the fray?
Not much point - everyone is working hard on the 8.4 release right now
and unlikely to want to start discussing such a change at the moment.
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
In response to
pgadmin-support by date
|Next:||From: Horacio Zavala||Date: 2009-01-12 18:50:55|
|Subject: default user |
|Previous:||From: Sufficool, Stanley||Date: 2009-01-12 16:36:17|
|Subject: Re: Re : Feature request: pgdump and version number / -i option|