From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "Sufficool, Stanley" <ssufficool(at)rov(dot)sbcounty(dot)gov> |
Cc: | "Laurent ROCHE" <laurent_roche(at)yahoo(dot)com>, "pgAdmin III support" <pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Re : Feature request: pgdump and version number / -i option |
Date: | 2009-01-12 16:50:59 |
Message-ID: | 937d27e10901120850n4ff16bc2y9e6d87cf5d62d76a@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-support |
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Sufficool, Stanley
<ssufficool(at)rov(dot)sbcounty(dot)gov> wrote:
> If we can get these tools as libraries with exported functions, then
> wouldn't just be a matter of some UDF calling the C libraries?
Yes, exactly.
> It would be ideal to get this absorbed into the mainline PG development,
> but proof that it works and has a userbase would go a long way towards
> acceptance.
>
> As I noted in my first post, I am very aware that this could break
> client side backups. Your idea of streaming the backup is something I
> hadn't considered. If the stream was compressed, then this would
> actually reduce backup times at the client!
>
> Should I join and cross post to pg-hackers to bring them into the fray?
Not much point - everyone is working hard on the 8.4 release right now
and unlikely to want to start discussing such a change at the moment.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Horacio Zavala | 2009-01-12 18:50:55 | default user |
Previous Message | Sufficool, Stanley | 2009-01-12 16:36:17 | Re: Re : Feature request: pgdump and version number / -i option |