On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 8:02 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>> Hah - from the man that argued against over-engineering techdocs a few
>> years back, that's funny. We don't need software to manage what is
>> currently less than a couple of dozen sponsors. A spreadsheet listing
>> them, review date and qualifying criteria which is periodically
>> re-assessed will be more than adequate.
> Actually, there are quite a few more than that. Dozens to hundreds
> depending on whom we include. You're only thinking about the handful of
> large corporate donors, and not the scores of individual givers and in-kind
No, I'm not because if you think we should start tracking and listing
everyone that gives us five bucks then you clearly need to come in out
of the sun for a while :-).
We're talking about managing a single page of major sponsors on our
website. It's not rocket science, doesn't need specialist software and
should be a relatively trivial task.
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
In response to
pgsql-www by date
|Next:||From: Dave Page||Date: 2008-08-21 19:25:36|
|Subject: Re: request for sponsors page|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2008-08-21 19:04:33|
|Subject: Re: [FINALLY] the TODO list has migrated to Wiki |