Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: BUG #4267: initdb fails

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: "Craig Ringer" <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: "Vadim Karacharsky" <sw(at)mail(dot)ru>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #4267: initdb fails
Date: 2008-06-28 12:56:00
Message-ID: 937d27e10806280556v482d6680oa77e6fe60fa01fd1@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 6:26 PM, Craig Ringer
<craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au> wrote:

> Alas, Process Explorer doesn't seem to work on Vista. MS think that Process
> monitor is a replacement, but it lacks all the handy detailed process
> introspection, thread control, etc that Process Explorer has.
>
> Frustrating.

Eh? Process Monitor certainly works on Vista (although I haven't used
it on SP1 yet). I used it extensively when trying to figure out a
rather nasty bug issue in our privilege-shedding code a while back.

-- 
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Craig RingerDate: 2008-06-28 13:12:15
Subject: Re: BUG #4267: initdb fails
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-06-27 21:08:35
Subject: Re: LEFT OUTER JOIN and WHERE madness (8.3.3 bug?)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group