Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: stat() vs cygwin

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: stat() vs cygwin
Date: 2008-06-24 08:47:00
Message-ID: 937d27e10806240147v7e0c9f4fje8ca0a29b3a12646@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 9:32 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> Yes.
>
> As in the cygwin build does build. Nobody really has verified if the fix
> is needed there. But frankly, if you are likely to care about the
> effects of this issue, you won't be running cygwin anyway. It's mostly a
> dead platform for postgresql anyway, AFAICS we only keep it building for
> legacy compatibility. Once it starts taking lots of resources to keep
> building (which it doesn't now), I think we should just drop it instead...

FWIW, the most recent packages from Cygwin themselves are 8.2.5.

-- 
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2008-06-24 12:21:48
Subject: Re: Dept of ugly hacks: eliminating padding space in system indexes
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2008-06-24 08:32:08
Subject: Re: stat() vs cygwin

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group