On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 9:32 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> As in the cygwin build does build. Nobody really has verified if the fix
> is needed there. But frankly, if you are likely to care about the
> effects of this issue, you won't be running cygwin anyway. It's mostly a
> dead platform for postgresql anyway, AFAICS we only keep it building for
> legacy compatibility. Once it starts taking lots of resources to keep
> building (which it doesn't now), I think we should just drop it instead...
FWIW, the most recent packages from Cygwin themselves are 8.2.5.
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Heikki Linnakangas||Date: 2008-06-24 12:21:48|
|Subject: Re: Dept of ugly hacks: eliminating padding space in system indexes|
|Previous:||From: Magnus Hagander||Date: 2008-06-24 08:32:08|
|Subject: Re: stat() vs cygwin|