Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: We should get active / Wiki choice

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: "Jean-Paul Argudo" <jean-paul(at)postgresqlfr(dot)org>, "Koen Martens" <gmc(at)sonologic(dot)nl>, "Susanne Ebrecht" <miracee(at)miracee(dot)de>, Cédric Villemain <cedric(dot)villemain(at)dalibo(dot)com>, damien(at)dalibo(dot)info, pgeu-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: We should get active / Wiki choice
Date: 2008-02-26 11:31:50
Message-ID: 937d27e10802260331t69152e38t701e7c7aa7e3272c@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgeu-general
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:59:29AM +0100, Jean-Paul Argudo wrote:
>  > > However, if you have a properly configured wiki, with good access
>  > > control support, you can take that burden from the user and avoid
>  > > mistakes like that. Mediawiki [...]
>  >
>  > Yes, Mediawiki... well, we know.
>
>  I don't really know different wikis (and honestly, most of the ones I've
>  worked with I don't really like). But there is one big argument *for*
>  mediawiki: we already have this installed in the PostgreSQL infrastructure,
>  thus it's not an entirely new product that needs to go in. (It's a new
>  install of one, sure, but it's not a new product)
>

That and it runs on Postgres which I think is an important
consideration. Yuck, dog food :-p

-- 
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Oracle-compatible database company

In response to

Responses

pgeu-general by date

Next:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2008-02-26 11:36:31
Subject: Re: We should get active / Wiki choice
Previous:From: Koen MartensDate: 2008-02-26 11:31:11
Subject: Re: We should get active / Wiki choice

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group