Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: WIP: Deferrable unique constraints

From: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)googlemail(dot)com>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WIP: Deferrable unique constraints
Date: 2009-07-21 21:01:26
Message-ID: 8e2dbb700907211401i76ec5e4tf351b0dd5b75e95b@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
2009/7/21 Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>:
> On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 17:24 +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote:
>> The same argument could be applied to ruleutils.c, trigfuncs.c and perhaps
>> one or two others.
>>
>> And if not there, where then?
>
> I'm moving the patch status back to "waiting on author" until Alvaro's
> concerns are addressed. I don't have an opinion about what should happen
> to the location of the file, but some kind of decision should be made.
>
> Regards,
>        Jeff Davis
>
>

OK, I'll try to post an updated patch soon.

I'm not seeing an obvious alternative location to utils/adt. Any advice would
be appreciated.

 - Dean

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Jeff DavisDate: 2009-07-21 21:05:57
Subject: Re: WIP: Deferrable unique constraints
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2009-07-21 20:49:45
Subject: Re: bytea vs. pg_dump

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group