2009/7/21 Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>:
> On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 17:24 +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote:
>> The same argument could be applied to ruleutils.c, trigfuncs.c and perhaps
>> one or two others.
>> And if not there, where then?
> I'm moving the patch status back to "waiting on author" until Alvaro's
> concerns are addressed. I don't have an opinion about what should happen
> to the location of the file, but some kind of decision should be made.
> Jeff Davis
OK, I'll try to post an updated patch soon.
I'm not seeing an obvious alternative location to utils/adt. Any advice would
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Jeff Davis||Date: 2009-07-21 21:05:57|
|Subject: Re: WIP: Deferrable unique constraints|
|Previous:||From: Andrew Dunstan||Date: 2009-07-21 20:49:45|
|Subject: Re: bytea vs. pg_dump|