On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Bad idea: once set, it'll never get unset, thus leaving installations
> with a weakened security posture even after they've installed fixed
> versions of openssl.
> regards, tom lane
One might argue that the current method is already weakened as it is
measured by the amount of data sent instead of of a length of time. A
session could live a long time under the 512MB threshold depending on
the queries that are being performed.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2010-02-03 15:58:37|
|Subject: Re: rbtree test data|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-02-03 15:48:20|
|Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Assorted cleanups in preparation for using a map file to support |