Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> There is *no* credible use case for this (hint: MOVE FORWARD/BACKWARD
>> ALL does not need this to work for >2G tables).

> Already done because of bad coding.  You want the TODO item removed too?

As I said, I see no use case for it.  Maybe if Moore's Law holds up for
another five or ten years, it'll look like a useful feature then ...

			regards, tom lane

In response to

• Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Change FETCH/MOVE at 2006-09-03 03:24:40 from Bruce Momjian

Responses

• Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Change FETCH/MOVE at 2006-09-03 13:37:41 from Bruce Momjian

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Peter Eisentraut	Date: 2006-09-03 06:58:34
	Subject: Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2006-09-03 04:47:21
	Subject: Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta

pgsql-committers by date

Next:	From: User Gsmet	Date: 2006-09-03 09:38:25
	Subject: pgfouine - pgfouine: * [0.7] commited Devrim Gunduz's changes to the
Previous:	From: Michael Glaesemann	Date: 2006-09-03 04:33:19
	Subject: Re: pgsql: Properly round months into days and into seconds for interval

pgsql-patches by date

Next:	From: Michael Glaesemann	Date: 2006-09-03 11:00:30
	Subject: Re: Interval month, week -> day
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2006-09-03 04:33:11
	Subject: Re: better support of out parameters in plperl