Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> There is *no* credible use case for this (hint: MOVE FORWARD/BACKWARD
>> ALL does not need this to work for >2G tables).
> Already done because of bad coding. You want the TODO item removed too?
As I said, I see no use case for it. Maybe if Moore's Law holds up for
another five or ten years, it'll look like a useful feature then ...
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2006-09-03 06:58:34|
|Subject: Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2006-09-03 04:47:21|
|Subject: Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta |
pgsql-committers by date
|Next:||From: User Gsmet||Date: 2006-09-03 09:38:25|
|Subject: pgfouine - pgfouine: * [0.7] commited Devrim Gunduz's changes to the |
|Previous:||From: Michael Glaesemann||Date: 2006-09-03 04:33:19|
|Subject: Re: pgsql: Properly round months into days and into seconds for interval |
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Michael Glaesemann||Date: 2006-09-03 11:00:30|
|Subject: Re: Interval month, week -> day |
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2006-09-03 04:33:11|
|Subject: Re: better support of out parameters in plperl |