Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: WIP: plpgsql source code obfuscation

From: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "pgsql-patches" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: plpgsql source code obfuscation
Date: 2008-01-28 17:05:13
Message-ID: 87wsptq3sm.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
"Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:

>> In such a scheme I think you would put the key in an attribute of the
>> language. Either in pg_lang or some configuration location which the
>> obfuscate:plperl interpreter knows where to find.
>>
>
> what is advantage?

It wouldn't require any core changes. It would be just another PL language to
load which can be installed like other ones. This could be a big advantage
because it doesn't look like there is a lot of support for putting th
obfuscation directly into the core code.

-- 
  Gregory Stark
  EnterpriseDB          http://www.enterprisedb.com
  Ask me about EnterpriseDB's 24x7 Postgres support!

In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: David FetterDate: 2008-01-28 17:07:46
Subject: Re: Auto-explain patch
Previous:From: Pavel StehuleDate: 2008-01-28 16:04:47
Subject: Re: WIP: plpgsql source code obfuscation

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group