Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Synchronous commit not... synchronous?

From: Florian Weimer <fw(at)deneb(dot)enyo(dot)de>
To: Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Peter van Hardenberg <pvh(at)pvh(dot)ca>, "pgsql-hackers\(at)postgresql(dot)org Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Synchronous commit not... synchronous?
Date: 2012-11-03 21:44:41
Message-ID: 87pq3uxsxi.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
* Daniel Farina:

> The idea of canceling a COMMIT statement causing a COMMIT seems pretty
> strange to me.

Canceling commits is inherently racy, so I'm not sure if this behavior
so strange after all.


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Alexander KorotkovDate: 2012-11-03 21:53:19
Subject: Re: Incorrect behaviour when using a GiST index on points
Previous:From: Pavel StehuleDate: 2012-11-03 18:48:20
Subject: Fwd: Stalled post to pgsql-hackers

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group