Re: Lisp as a procedural language?

From: Volkan YAZICI <yazicivo(at)ttmail(dot)com>
To: znmeb(at)cesmail(dot)net
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Lisp as a procedural language?
Date: 2008-10-19 06:24:58
Message-ID: 87od1h3xvp.fsf@alamut.mobiliz.com.tr
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb(at)cesmail(dot)net> writes:
> Someone at the PostgreSQL West conference last weekend expressed an
> interest in a Lisp procedural language. The only two Lisp environments
> I've found so far that aren't GPL are Steel Bank Common Lisp (MIT,
> http://sbcl.sourceforge.net) and XLispStat (BSD,
> http://www.stat.uiowa.edu/~luke/xls/xlsinfo/xlsinfo.html) SBCL is a
> very active project, but I'm not sure about XLispStat.

You see PL/scheme[1]?

Regards.

[1] http://plscheme.projects.postgresql.org/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Boley 2008-10-19 17:09:47 Re: Cross-column statistics revisited
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-10-19 01:30:29 Re: Lisp as a procedural language?