Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Read only transactions - Commit or Rollback

From: Andreas Seltenreich <andreas+pg(at)gate450(dot)dyndns(dot)org>
To: Markus Schaber <schabi(at)logix-tt(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Performance List <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Read only transactions - Commit or Rollback
Date: 2005-12-20 12:27:05
Message-ID: 87mziwj6na.fsf@gate450.dyndns.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
Markus Schaber writes:

> As I said, there usually are no writing transactions on the same database.
>
> Btw, there's another setting that might make a difference:
>
> Having ACID-Level SERIALIZABLE or READ COMMITED?

Well, if nonrepeatable or phantom reads would pose a problem because
of those occasional writes, you wouldn't be considering autocommit for
performance reasons either, would you?

regards,
Andreas
-- 

In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Markus SchaberDate: 2005-12-20 12:31:53
Subject: Re: Read only transactions - Commit or Rollback
Previous:From: Michael RiessDate: 2005-12-20 12:05:30
Subject: Re: Read only transactions - Commit or Rollback

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group