From: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Evan Carroll" <lists(at)evancarroll(dot)com> |
Cc: | <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 8.2 Query 10 times slower than 8.1 (view-heavy) |
Date: | 2007-08-28 15:58:12 |
Message-ID: | 87k5rfslbf.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
"Evan Carroll" <lists(at)evancarroll(dot)com> writes:
"Evan Carroll" <lists(at)evancarroll(dot)com> writes:
> Dearest dragon hunters and mortal wanna-bes,
>
> I recently upgraded a system from Apache2/mod_perl2 to
> Lighttpd/fastcgi. The upgrade went about as rough as can be. While in
> the midst of a bad day, I decided to make it worse, and upgrade Pg 8.1
> to 8.2. Most people I talk to seem to think 8.1 was a lemon release;
> not I. It worked excellent for me for the longest time, and I had no
> good reason to upgrade it, other than to just have done so.
I assume you mean 8.1.9 and 8.2.4?
> The following material is provided for your assisting-me-pleasure: the
> original SQL; the \ds for all pertinent views and tables; the output
> of Explain Analyze; and the original query.
While I do in fact enjoy analyzing query plans I have to say that 75-line
plans push the bounds of my assisting-you-pleasure. Have you experimented with
simplifying this query?
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-08-28 16:17:28 | Re: 8.2 Query 10 times slower than 8.1 (view-heavy) |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-08-28 15:44:03 | Re: FW: was [PERFORM] partitioned table and ORDER BY indexed_field DESC LIMIT 1 |