Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Removal of backward-compatibility docs mentions

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Removal of backward-compatibility docs mentions
Date: 2006-03-20 23:13:10
Message-ID: 8792.1142896390@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> currently-useful information is intertwined with the reference to the
>> old behavior.  If you can't be bothered to rewrite to preserve all of
>> the information, then don't remove the text.

> I am working on Neils suggestion.  I don't agree we need to preserve all
> information about very old releases.

That's not what I complained about.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2006-03-20 23:13:45
Subject: Re: Additional current timestamp values
Previous:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2006-03-20 23:05:02
Subject: Re: Additional current timestamp values

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group