Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: darwin pgsql patches

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Bierman <bierman(at)apple(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: darwin pgsql patches
Date: 2000-11-29 22:35:27
Message-ID: 8411.975537327@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Peter Bierman <bierman(at)apple(dot)com> writes:
>> Here the question was why the existing powerpc code doesn't work.  There
>> are only syntax differences.  Any idea?

> I think it has more to do with Apple's forked gcc than anything
> else. I don't have a LinuxPPC machine to check if adding the rX syntax
> there would continue to work.

I do (have a LinuxPPC machine), so if you'd identify exactly what I
should try, I'll be glad to check this point.  Seems like it'd be smart
to minimize the number of PPC variants of this routine.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2000-11-29 23:07:16
Subject: Re: darwin pgsql patches
Previous:From: Peter BiermanDate: 2000-11-29 22:21:03
Subject: Re: darwin pgsql patches

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group