Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [RFC] extended txid docs

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Marko Kreen" <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Chris Browne" <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [RFC] extended txid docs
Date: 2007-10-17 17:36:43
Message-ID: 8288.1192642603@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
"Marko Kreen" <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Thanks.  Here is a version with your changes applied, plus
> minor code cleanup and example output.

I can't really see the reasoning for putting this into the PG
documentation.  It's tremendously complicated and doesn't seem like
something very many people would want to read about.  In any case
it seems rather out of place where it is --- we don't have large
code examples elsewhere in func.sgml.

It almost looks like something that should be turned into a pgfoundry
or contrib module.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Gregory StarkDate: 2007-10-17 17:57:51
Subject: Deprecating heap_formtuple/heap_modifytuple/heap_deformtuple
Previous:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2007-10-17 17:36:32
Subject: Re: Why copy_relation_data only use walwhenWALarchivingis enabled

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Jacky LengDate: 2007-10-18 01:27:49
Subject: Re: Why copy_relation_data only use wal whenWALarchivingis enabled
Previous:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2007-10-17 17:36:32
Subject: Re: Why copy_relation_data only use walwhenWALarchivingis enabled

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group