Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Numeric 508 datatype

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Numeric 508 datatype
Date: 2005-12-02 22:20:21
Message-ID: 8155.1133562021@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I found the cause.  I traced into printf then realized I was not in libc
> but port/snprintf.c, and I see 4096 defined for those buffers.

Uh, how is control getting to snprintf?  I don't see that used either
in numeric.c or in printtup.c.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-12-02 22:23:53
Subject: Re: Numeric 508 datatype
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-12-02 22:11:13
Subject: Re: Numeric 508 datatype

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-12-02 22:23:53
Subject: Re: Numeric 508 datatype
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-12-02 22:14:57
Subject: Patch for gripe about pg_dump -C not dumping database privileges

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-12-02 22:23:53
Subject: Re: Numeric 508 datatype
Previous:From: Tony CadutoDate: 2005-12-02 22:18:53
Subject: Re: was a initdb required from 8.1beta3 -> beta4?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group