Re: Re: starting to review the Extend NOT NULL representation to pg_constraint patch

From: Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Geery <andrew(dot)geery(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Re: starting to review the Extend NOT NULL representation to pg_constraint patch
Date: 2011-06-24 16:56:26
Message-ID: 7D9114CB102A652EF4036E6B@apophis.local
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

--On 24. Juni 2011 12:06:17 -0400 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Uh, really? pg_upgrade uses SQL commands to recreate the contents of
> the system catalogs, so if these entries aren't getting created
> automatically, that sounds like a bug in the patch...

AFAIR, i've tested it and it worked as expected.

--
Thanks

Bernd

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2011-06-24 17:02:11 News on Clang
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2011-06-24 16:51:37 Optimizing pg_trgm makesign() (was Re: WIP: Fast GiST index build)