Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Gram.y patches for better parenthesis handling.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
Cc: PGSQL Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org>, pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us
Subject: Re: Gram.y patches for better parenthesis handling.
Date: 2000-10-28 16:41:19
Message-ID: 7893.972751279@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> writes:
> Err, with Tom's objections, why was this applied?

> * Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> [001028 11:34]:
>> Applied.   Thanks.

Itchy trigger finger today, Bruce?

Please revert the change --- I'm still discussing it with Kevin offlist,
but I don't feel it's acceptable as-is because it breaks reasonable
(non-redundant) UNION/INTERSECT/EXCEPT constructs that have worked for
several releases past.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Timothy H. KeittDate: 2000-10-28 16:59:06
Subject: Location of client header files
Previous:From: Larry RosenmanDate: 2000-10-28 16:38:53
Subject: Re: Gram.y patches for better parenthesis handling.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group