Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> The last item on my list before close is making VACUUM FULL and Hot
> Standby play nicely together.
> The options to do this were and still are:
> (1) Add WAL messages for non-transactional relcache invalidations
> (2) Allow system relations to be cluster-ed/vacuum full-ed.
> (1) was how we did it originally and I believe it worked without
> problem. We saw the opportunity to do (2) and it has been worth
Refresh my memory on why (1) lets us avoid fixing (2)? It sounds
like a kluge at best ...
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2010-01-30 20:31:15|
|Subject: Re: Hot Standby and VACUUM FULL|
|Previous:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2010-01-30 19:30:31|
|Subject: Hot Standby and VACUUM FULL|