Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> The last item on my list before close is making VACUUM FULL and Hot
> Standby play nicely together.

> The options to do this were and still are:

> (1) Add WAL messages for non-transactional relcache invalidations
> (2) Allow system relations to be cluster-ed/vacuum full-ed.

> (1) was how we did it originally and I believe it worked without
> problem. We saw the opportunity to do (2) and it has been worth
> exploring.

Refresh my memory on why (1) lets us avoid fixing (2)?  It sounds
like a kluge at best ...

			regards, tom lane

In response to

• Hot Standby and VACUUM FULL at 2010-01-30 19:30:31 from Simon Riggs

Responses

• Re: Hot Standby and VACUUM FULL at 2010-01-30 20:31:15 from Simon Riggs

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Simon Riggs	Date: 2010-01-30 20:31:15
	Subject: Re: Hot Standby and VACUUM FULL
Previous:	From: Simon Riggs	Date: 2010-01-30 19:30:31
	Subject: Hot Standby and VACUUM FULL