Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> writes:
> I'm not against the idea of a config variable, but this is what, the
> third or fourth go around on this? It seems rather unfair to put this
> burden upon the current patch writer at this stage of the game...
The fact that objections keep being raised should suggest to you that
the idea is not uncontroversial. I think it's necessary to look for a
compromise that everyone can live with. You're really wasting your
breath to repeat the same arguments over and over and expect that
anyone's mind will change.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2005-05-28 16:03:38|
|Subject: Re: hash index work |
|Previous:||From: Robert Treat||Date: 2005-05-28 14:23:37|
|Subject: Re: psql backslash consistency|