Re: PG 7.2b4 bug?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PG 7.2b4 bug?
Date: 2001-12-17 21:59:47
Message-ID: 7529.1008626387@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com> writes:
> Most language standards - at least the ones I've worked
> on - require compliant implementations to define and document
> implementation-defined behavior ...

SQL99 saith:

g) implementation-defined: Possibly differing between SQL-
implementations, but specified by the implementor for each
particular SQL-implementation.

h) implementation-dependent: Possibly differing between SQL-
implementations, but not specified by ISO/IEC 9075, and not
required to be specified by the implementor for any particular
SQL-implementations.

Behavior of nondeterministic functions falls in the second category ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Philip Warner 2001-12-17 22:01:25 Re: Potential bug in pg_dump ...
Previous Message Don Baccus 2001-12-17 21:54:39 Re: PG 7.2b4 bug?