Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow ALTER TABLE ...

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow ALTER TABLE ...
Date: 2006-02-12 03:34:41
Message-ID: 7523.1139715281@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committerspgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> This patch appears seriously broken, in particular every routine I
>> looked at contained incorrect locking assumptions.  Nor do I care
>> for using pg_depend for the purposes it's being used for here.

> OK, how do we proceed?  Revert or apply a second patch?

I'd say revert; the patch is going to need significant rework.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-committers by date

Next:From: James William PyeDate: 2006-02-12 03:54:15
Subject: python - fe: Clients can get PANIC ereports too.
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-02-12 03:30:21
Subject: pgsql: Fix more fallout from line-wrap patch, to wit, arbitrarily

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-02-12 03:39:44
Subject: Re: TODO item -- Improve psql's handling of multi-line
Previous:From: Sergey E. KoposovDate: 2006-02-12 03:31:13
Subject: Re: TODO item -- Improve psql's handling of multi-line

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group