On 1/4/07, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> markwkm(at)gmail(dot)com wrote:
> > On 1/4/07, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 09:09 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >> > That also happens. The only way I can see of ensuring it does not
> >> happen
> >> > would be to auto-process all patch submissions.
> >>
> >> Sounds a good idea. Patch farm anyone? Auto apply/make check?
> >
> > I'm actually trying to simplify something I was working on at OSDL to
> > do this.  PLM at OSDL was a little to Linux focused.  Will let
> > everyone know when I have a working prototype.
> >
>
> Feel free to discuss design/functionality any time. For example, a
> mechanism to feed patches to the buildfarm has previously been
> suggested. If this could be done in some automated, controlled and
> reasonably safe way it might be useful - it might afford reviewers a
> "try before you buy" option. Also, hooking this up with the stuff that
> Lukas Smith is doing might be good.

I'll start another thread about what PLM is doing and what my initial
ideas are.  Do you have a pointer to what Lukas Smith is doing?

Mark

In response to

• Re: 8.3 pending patch queue at 2007-01-04 17:24:10 from Andrew Dunstan

Responses

• Re: 8.3 pending patch queue at 2007-01-04 19:15:17 from Andrew Dunstan

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Simon Riggs	Date: 2007-01-04 19:12:00
	Subject: Re: ReadyForQuery()
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2007-01-04 18:17:34
	Subject: Re: ReadyForQuery()