Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf
Date: 2009-03-30 15:56:21
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 30 mar 2009, at 17.24, Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com> wrote:

> Tom Lane wrote:
>> BTW, unless someone objects I'd like to make the name of that  
>> function
>> PQinitSecurity.
> Agreed.  Although, both PQinitSecure and PQinitSecurity are very  
> general names.  "Security" can mean a lot of things.  Maybe the name  
> should be more particular, like PQinitOpenSSL.  I think its okay to  
> reference the openssl project name being how this function is  
> designed to work with openssl's library split.

It's quite likely that well want to support another ssl library in the  
future. At least likely enough that any api we define should take it  
into consideration.


In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2009-03-30 16:02:20
Subject: Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf
Previous:From: Guillaume LelargeDate: 2009-03-30 15:46:27
Subject: Re: gettext, plural form and translation

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group