> Having read through this massive thread, I concluded the
> CONNX signal stuff is the way to go. Where there any Win32
> TODO items in there? I didn't see any.
Well. There is one in the form of "make signal handlers thread-safe or
defer non-threadsafe handlers".
But before we're committed down that path, I think we need someone with
really good knowledge in those signal handlers to comment on wether this
sounsd reasonable at all, or if it iwll be too much work. I know I don't
have that knowledge, and from what I read we've had nobody speak up yet.
Basically, we want signal handlers to run on a separate thread from the
pgsql-hackers-win32 by date
|Next:||From: Magnus Hagander||Date: 2003-12-17 12:47:53|
|Subject: Pipes vs Events|
|Previous:||From: Andrew Dunstan||Date: 2003-12-17 02:23:03|
|Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UTF support in WIN32 native and Lower/Upper in 7.5 release|