From:
Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
To:
Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc:
"Greg Smith" <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>,
"Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,
"Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>,
"Stephen Frost" <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>,
pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org,
pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject:
Re: Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work
Date:
2008-04-02 00:53:23
Message-ID:
68A59804-1339-4687-A9E7-7B3A6C39CD5F@fastcrypt.com (view raw or flat )
Thread:
2008-03-31 23:26:29 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2008-04-01 00:46:44 from Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
2008-04-01 01:51:08 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2008-04-01 02:12:06 from Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
2008-04-01 05:35:24 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2008-04-01 05:51:11 from "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>
2008-04-01 06:06:36 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2008-04-01 06:52:55 from "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>
2008-04-02 00:05:12 from Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
2008-04-02 00:35:17 from "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>
2008-04-02 00:53:23 from Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
2008-04-02 01:04:04 from "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>
2008-04-10 09:47:36 from Thomas Burdairon <tburdairon(at)entelience(dot)com>
2008-04-10 10:44:20 from Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
2008-04-10 12:33:39 from Thomas Burdairon <tburdairon(at)entelience(dot)com>
2008-05-29 03:13:12 from "Jignesh K(dot) Shah" <J(dot)K(dot)Shah(at)Sun(dot)COM>
2008-05-29 03:19:45 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2008-05-29 03:22:34 from "Jignesh K(dot) Shah" <J(dot)K(dot)Shah(at)Sun(dot)COM>
2008-04-01 10:25:14 from Michael Paesold <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at>
2008-04-01 11:14:34 from Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
2008-04-01 14:06:01 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2008-04-01 14:26:52 from Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
2008-04-01 14:43:58 from PFC <lists(at)peufeu(dot)com>
2008-04-01 14:21:34 from Michael Paesold <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at>
2008-05-23 10:20:45 from Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
2008-05-23 13:20:21 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2008-05-28 12:25:14 from Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
2008-05-28 14:24:51 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Lists:
pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc
Guillaume,
I for one would be very interested in the JDBCBench code.
Dave
On 1-Apr-08, at 8:35 PM, Guillaume Smet wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 2:05 AM, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
> wrote:
>> I'm not sure if all of those changes are net positive for PostgreSQL
>> though, they weren't last time I played with this.
>
> I fixed most of the bugs of JDBCBench I found when I benchmarked
> Sequoia a long time ago. Totally forgot about it. I'll see if I can
> find the sources somewhere.
>
> --
> Guillaume
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
In response to
Responses
pgsql-hackers by date
Next :From: Guillaume SmetDate: 2008-04-02 00:56:13
Subject : Re: New boxes available for QA
Previous :From : Marc G. FournierDate : 2008-04-02 00:40:22
Subject : Re: Several tags around PostgreSQL 7.1 broken
pgsql-jdbc by date
Next :From: Guillaume SmetDate: 2008-04-02 01:04:04
Subject : Re: Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work
Previous :From : Guillaume SmetDate : 2008-04-02 00:35:17
Subject : Re: Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work