Re: How many fields in a table are too many

From: <btober(at)seaworthysys(dot)com>
To: <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
Cc: <m_tessier(at)sympatico(dot)ca>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: How many fields in a table are too many
Date: 2003-06-26 07:44:51
Message-ID: 65080.66.212.203.144.1056613491.squirrel@$HOSTNAME
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


> On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 03:17:12AM -0400, btober(at)seaworthysys(dot)com
> wrote:
>> > I have a table with 13 fields. Is that
>> > too many fields for one table.
>> > Mark
>> >
>>
>> Thirteen? No way. I've got you beat with 21:
>
> Pfft! Is *that* all? I've got a table with 116 fields.

I *knew* a number of these responses would be forthcoming... :)

~Berend Tober

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shridhar Daithankar 2003-06-26 07:49:09 Re: How many fields in a table are too many
Previous Message Peter Childs 2003-06-26 07:33:10 Re: Question regarding performance (large objects involved)