Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Re: [GENERAL] [Help] Temporary Table: Implicitely created index not shown in \d i

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Itzinger, Oskar" <oitzinger(at)opec(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: [GENERAL] [Help] Temporary Table: Implicitely created index not shown in \d i
Date: 2001-06-22 23:17:40
Message-ID: 6394.993251860@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> 	test=> \d 
> 	No relations found.
> 	test=> \di
> 	No relations found.
> 	test=> \dS
> 	          List of relations
> 	      Name      |   Type   |  Owner   
> 	----------------+----------+----------
> 	...
> 	 pg_temp_5396_0 | sequence | postgres
> 	 pg_temp_5396_1 | table    | postgres

Hm.  Shouldn't psql's \dS ignore temp items, since \d and \di do?
Otherwise this looks pretty good...

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-06-22 23:22:04
Subject: Re: Re: [GENERAL] [Help] Temporary Table: Implicitely created index not shown in \d i
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-06-22 23:04:19
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] [Help] Temporary Table: Implicitely created index not shown in \d i

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2001-06-22 23:21:19
Subject: Re: Multiple Indexing, performance impact
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-06-22 23:13:09
Subject: Re: Multiple Indexing, performance impact

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group