Re: Multiple Indexing, performance impact

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Daniel Åkerud <zilch(at)home(dot)se>, PostgreSQL-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Multiple Indexing, performance impact
Date: 2001-06-22 23:13:09
Message-ID: 6360.993251589@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> We could offer a --with switch to manually choose the default, too.

> Good idea, yes. Not sure if we need a --with switch because they can
> just edit the postgresql.conf or postgresql.conf.sample file.

Well, we have a --with switch for DEF_MAXBACKENDS, so one for the
default number of buffers doesn't seem too unreasonable. I wouldn't
bother with it if configure didn't have to touch the value anyway...
but it's just another line or two in configure.in...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-06-22 23:17:40 Re: Re: [GENERAL] [Help] Temporary Table: Implicitely created index not shown in \d i
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-06-22 23:04:19 Re: [GENERAL] [Help] Temporary Table: Implicitely created index not shown in \d i

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-06-22 23:21:19 Re: Multiple Indexing, performance impact
Previous Message Pedro Abelleira Seco 2001-06-22 23:01:42 RE: Universal admin frontend