pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de (Andreas Pflug) writes:
> Dave Page wrote:
>>> From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
>>> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Andreas
>>>Sent: 31 May 2006 16:41
>>>Cc: Tom Lane; pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
>>>Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Possible TODO item: copy to/from pipe
>>>Andreas Pflug wrote:
>>>> Won't help too much, until gzip's output is piped back too, so a
>>>> replacement for COPY .. TO STDOUT COMPRESSED would be
>>>> COPY ... TO '| /bin/gzip |' STDOUT, to enable clients to
>>> receive the
>>>Forgot to mention:
>>> COPY COMPRESSED was also meant to introduce a portable format
>>> that's efficient for both text and binary data. Relying on some
>>> external XYZzip version seems not too portable to me.
>> It does have that advantage. Gzip and others are not particularly
>> Windows friendly for example.
> ... as most windows programs are pipe agnostic.
Shall we make PostgreSQL less powerful because of that?
"Love is like a snowmobile flying over the frozen tundra that suddenly
flips, pinning you underneath. At night, the ice weasels come."
-- Matt Groening
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Joachim Wieland||Date: 2006-05-31 17:58:16|
|Subject: Re: Allow commenting of variables in postgresql.conf to - try2|
|Previous:||From: Magnus Hagander||Date: 2006-05-31 17:28:20|
|Subject: Re: Possible TODO item: copy to/from pipe|