On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 8:48 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> 2010/2/3 Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>:
>>> Can you rename RED and BLACK to RBRED and RBBLACK?
>> Yes, of course, done.
>> Any objections to commit?
> I would like to see point #2 of the following email addressed before
> commit. As things stand, it is not clear (at least to me) whether
> this is a win.
Specifically, on this web page:
There is a section that begins with this line of text:
Repeat test with 100,000 identical records varying array length (len).
That test shows rbtree being a third slower than HEAD. But there's
not enough information on that web page to replicate that test, so
it's hard to speculate on what may be going wrong. I don't think we
should commit this until we understand that.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-02-03 16:13:47|
|Subject: Re: Review of Writeable CTE Patch |
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-02-03 16:09:29|
|Subject: Re: Recent vendor SSL renegotiation patches break PostgreSQL |