On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> For now it could - but it very well might be converted to sync_file_range or
> similar, which would have different "sideeffects".
> As the potential code duplication is rather small I would prefer to describe
> the prime effect not the sideeffects...
Hmm, in that case, I think the problem is that this function has no
comment explaining its intended charter.
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: Pavel Stehule||Date: 2010-02-02 19:07:10|
|Subject: Re: Queries within a function|
|Previous:||From: Matt White||Date: 2010-02-02 19:03:42|
|Subject: Re: Slow-ish Query Needs Some Love|
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Andres Freund||Date: 2010-02-02 19:08:12|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Faster CREATE DATABASE by delaying fsync (was 8.4.1 ubuntu karmic slow createdb)|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-02-02 18:55:31|
|Subject: Re: New VACUUM FULL crashes on temp relations |