On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 7:36 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I hope, so this version is more readable and more clean. I removed
> some not necessary checks.
This still seems overly complicated to me. I spent a few hours today
working up the attached patch. Let me know your thoughts.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2010-01-27 20:12:28|
|Subject: Re: Patch: Remove gcc dependency in definition of inline functions|
|Previous:||From: Heikki Linnakangas||Date: 2010-01-27 20:06:43|
|Subject: Re: C function accepting/returning cstring vs. text|