From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: damage control mode |
Date: | 2010-01-12 02:50:45 |
Message-ID: | 603c8f071001111850v575c14dfrcdda590f39debd71@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> We could if we could all stop long enough to address them. I think
> there is the feeling that a great idea will pop up eventually, and only
> when we are looking at beta do we realize we are out of time, and the
> hard, sometime distasteful/ugly, decisions have to be made.
I think there's definitely some truth to that. It's basically a
project management issue: how do we make sure that decisions get made
on a way forward in a timely fashion? Of course, you already know my
opinion: the first thing we need is a good list of what the issues
are. :-)
>> > What amazes me is how many people who closely follow our development are
>> > mystified by what we do during that pre-beta period.
>>
>> Hey, I'm still mystified. Maybe you and Tom could do twice-a-week
>> status updates on what you're working on and anything you could use
>> help with, or something.
>
> Yea, that would probably help. I know I am not very transparent in this
> area.
Just my opinion: I think it would be awesome.
...Robert
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-01-12 02:54:49 | Re: damage control mode |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-01-12 02:47:14 | Re: pg_migrator issues |