On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> I agree that search and replace isn't that hard, but I don't find the
>> proposed construction awkward, and we have various uses of it in the
>> docs already. Actually the COPY one is not quite clear whether it
>> means <= 7.3 or < 7.3. I think we're just aiming for consistency here
>> as much as anything.
> Well, the problem is that "<= 8.4" is confusing as to whether it
> includes 8.4.n. You and I know that it does because we know we
> don't make feature changes in minor releases, but this is not
> necessarily obvious to everyone. "< 8.5" is much less ambiguous.
Ah. I would not have considered that, but it does make sense.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Greg Smith||Date: 2009-12-03 20:50:37|
|Subject: Re: [PATCH] Largeobject Access Controls (r2432)|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2009-12-03 20:33:51|
|Subject: Re: [PATCH] Largeobject Access Controls (r2432) |