Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: CommitFest status/management

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: CommitFest status/management
Date: 2009-12-01 14:43:30
Message-ID: 603c8f070912010643s782c0504r892b663b352643ca@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 9:42 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> If we went with Bruce's interpretation, we could have a "committer"
>> field that only appears when the status is "Claimed by Committer" or
>> "Committed" and the contents of that field could be displayed in
>> parentheses in the status column, like this: Claimed by Committer (Tom
>> Lane).
>
>> If we went with Andrew's interpretation, we would need a completely
>> separate column, because there wouldn't be any logical relationship
>> between the status field and the committer field.
>
>> Any other votes?  Tom?
>
> I'm happy with Andrew's interpretation --- I just want a separate text
> field for inserting a committer's name.  I don't want any magic behavior
> of that field.

OK, I'll add a separate text field for the committer's name, but for
now it won't display on the summary page, just the detail page.

...Robert

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2009-12-01 14:46:48
Subject: Re: Block-level CRC checks
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2009-12-01 14:43:18
Subject: Re: Block-level CRC checks

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group