Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Is there any performance penalty using --with-ssl?

From: Palle Girgensohn <girgen(at)partitur(dot)se>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Is there any performance penalty using --with-ssl?
Date: 2002-01-04 13:14:20
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
--On Friday, January 04, 2002 12:32:26 +0800 Christopher Kings-Lynne 
<chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> wrote:

>> Failure to build/run if SSL libraries are not available?
>> AFAIK there is no run-time penalty, especially not if the server is
>> started without the enable-ssl switch.  But there had better be an
>> SSL library to link with.
> Palle - the current Postgres Port uses the 'dialog' command to present a
> menu of what people can optionally compile in.  Why not just leave it in
> that menu?

Reason is, I am invesigating the possibility of totally removing the dialog 
and split all interfaces into separate ports. There are pros and cons to 
this idea, but IMO the pros win.


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Palle GirgensohnDate: 2002-01-04 13:20:44
Subject: Re: Is there any performance penalty using --with-ssl?
Previous:From: Fredrik EstreenDate: 2002-01-04 11:58:28
Subject: Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group