Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Is there any performance penalty using --with-ssl?

From: Palle Girgensohn <girgen(at)partitur(dot)se>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Is there any performance penalty using --with-ssl?
Date: 2002-01-04 13:14:20
Message-ID: 5920000.1010150060@palle.girgensohn.se (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
--On Friday, January 04, 2002 12:32:26 +0800 Christopher Kings-Lynne 
<chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> wrote:

>> Failure to build/run if SSL libraries are not available?
>>
>> AFAIK there is no run-time penalty, especially not if the server is
>> started without the enable-ssl switch.  But there had better be an
>> SSL library to link with.
>
> Palle - the current Postgres Port uses the 'dialog' command to present a
> menu of what people can optionally compile in.  Why not just leave it in
> that menu?

Reason is, I am invesigating the possibility of totally removing the dialog 
and split all interfaces into separate ports. There are pros and cons to 
this idea, but IMO the pros win.

/Palle




In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Palle GirgensohnDate: 2002-01-04 13:20:44
Subject: Re: Is there any performance penalty using --with-ssl?
Previous:From: Fredrik EstreenDate: 2002-01-04 11:58:28
Subject: Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group