From: | Palle Girgensohn <girgen(at)partitur(dot)se> |
---|---|
To: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Is there any performance penalty using --with-ssl? |
Date: | 2002-01-04 13:14:20 |
Message-ID: | 5920000.1010150060@palle.girgensohn.se |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
--On Friday, January 04, 2002 12:32:26 +0800 Christopher Kings-Lynne
<chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> wrote:
>> Failure to build/run if SSL libraries are not available?
>>
>> AFAIK there is no run-time penalty, especially not if the server is
>> started without the enable-ssl switch. But there had better be an
>> SSL library to link with.
>
> Palle - the current Postgres Port uses the 'dialog' command to present a
> menu of what people can optionally compile in. Why not just leave it in
> that menu?
Reason is, I am invesigating the possibility of totally removing the dialog
and split all interfaces into separate ports. There are pros and cons to
this idea, but IMO the pros win.
/Palle
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Palle Girgensohn | 2002-01-04 13:20:44 | Re: Is there any performance penalty using --with-ssl? |
Previous Message | Fredrik Estreen | 2002-01-04 11:58:28 | Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem |