Re: archive wal's failure and load increase.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: cedric(at)dreamgnu(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: archive wal's failure and load increase.
Date: 2006-09-28 21:28:18
Message-ID: 5858.1159478898@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Cedric Boudin <cedric(at)dreamgnu(dot)com> writes:
> So the question is: is there a correlation between not getting the wal's
> archived and this "massive" load growth?

Shouldn't be. Do you want to force the condition again and try to see
*where* the cycles are going? "High load factor" alone is a singularly
useless report. Also, how many unarchived WAL files were there?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ben 2006-09-28 22:18:56 any hope for my big query?
Previous Message Carlo Stonebanks 2006-09-28 21:04:31 Re: Performace Optimization for Dummies